Re: http://hms-anon.dreamwidth.org/277268.html?thread=1381624596#cmt1381624596

(Anonymous) 2015-07-30 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
it wouldn't be healthy for a long long time but eventually with random genetic mutations and enough baby popping you definitely could get there with just two humans

Re: http://hms-anon.dreamwidth.org/277268.html?thread=1381624596#cmt1381624596

(Anonymous) 2015-07-30 01:50 am (UTC)(link)
no, u really can't. not without having an unacceptably large risk of the entire population dying

Re: http://hms-anon.dreamwidth.org/277268.html?thread=1381624596#cmt1381624596

(Anonymous) 2015-07-30 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
biba at the point where you only have two humans left that risk isn't unacceptable

if the first few generations spawn enough that risk will also decrease

Re: http://hms-anon.dreamwidth.org/277268.html?thread=1381624596#cmt1381624596

(Anonymous) 2015-07-30 02:24 am (UTC)(link)
that's not how that works

Re: http://hms-anon.dreamwidth.org/277268.html?thread=1381624596#cmt1381624596

(Anonymous) 2015-07-30 02:31 am (UTC)(link)
it'll decrease at first and then increase once the genetic bottleneck becomes a problem

but surviving with only 2 is the most risky moment