mummysquid: (Default)
C:。ミ ([personal profile] mummysquid) wrote in [community profile] hms_anon2015-06-19 01:28 pm

(no subject)



deletion

In wake of the Charleston Church shooting please content warn your discussion of the event on anon.

(Anonymous) 2015-06-20 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt but idgaf about queer baiting written by a gay dude

esp since a theoretical relationship between hannibal and will wouldn't exactly be gr9 representation lol

(Anonymous) 2015-06-20 03:37 am (UTC)(link)
whocurr, not all representation needs to be fluffy

(Anonymous) 2015-06-20 03:41 am (UTC)(link)
lol tru but try telling tumblr (or like half of anon) that

(Anonymous) 2015-06-20 03:41 am (UTC)(link)
i can't get mad at fuller bc it's not his fault, he couldn't make them canon even if he wanted to

and it's the least malicious queerbaiting i've ever seen too

but the thing about hannibal and will not being great representation is a bullshit argument sorry

one dimensional queer villains as a stereotype is bad, but will is not a villain and hannibal isn't one dimensional and it wouldn't be a case of the straight hero defeating the queer villain