mummysquid: (Default)
Ｃ:。ミ ([personal profile] mummysquid) wrote in [community profile] hms_anon2013-01-06 08:17 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

(no subject)

oh god theres no gif what will we do



need anything deleted?
contact the mods
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

MODS

(Anonymous) 2013-01-06 08:09 pm (UTC)(link)
i thought riley shit was banned

Re: MODS

(Anonymous) 2013-01-06 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
just needs a 'trigger warning' i think

Re: MODS

(Anonymous) 2013-01-06 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
u were banned actually

sorry
terrylennox: (bb pluto)

Re: MODS

[personal profile] terrylennox 2013-01-06 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)
posts need a content warning and the regular trigger warning rules apply for the content, but they are not banned
Edited 2013-01-06 20:12 (UTC)

Re: MODS

(Anonymous) 2013-01-06 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)
is there any chance that it can be banned
terrylennox: (Default)

Re: MODS

[personal profile] terrylennox 2013-01-06 08:17 pm (UTC)(link)
maybe down the road, but nothing came of the mod discussion we had about it

Re: MODS

(Anonymous) 2013-01-06 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)
why fucking not

Re: MODS

(Anonymous) 2013-01-06 08:14 pm (UTC)(link)
but y'all were deleting it

why would you do that and then go back to letting it through?
terrylennox: (bb pluto)

Re: MODS

[personal profile] terrylennox 2013-01-06 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know what the other mods were doing but I only deleted posts that didn't have a warning in the subject line and/or violated the 3 per page rule. nonas brought up concerns that they would like a space where they can discuss riley's posts without their stans jumping them on tumblr. so right now we're holding to "content warning for the discussion, regular trigger rules apply" and that seems to be working okay for now. we're not shutting the door on banning them, just tabling the discussion.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only