There are basically two types of sexual people: the ones who have sex with everything that has an excrescence/a hole and don’t take the whole thing too seriously, and the ones who are waiting for ‘their first time with their right one’ and try to convince you that having sex is an ‘act of love’.
I kind of prefer the first type. At least, they don’t deny that sexual attraction is something completely normal to them and also a part of their basic instincts: there’s no elegant excuse behind their acts and intentions. They’re generally really gross people and I find talking with them really annoying, but I can deal with them somehow. If they don’t send me pictures of genitalia. And they usually do (I AM DISAPPOINT).
But I can’t stand the second type. They’re quite hypocritical, aren’t they? They try to justify their basic instincts with this fake excuse of ‘doing an act of love’. Because if you love someone, you must want to have sex with them (and here’s a kick in asexual people’s faces!). This is really annoying. To me sex is disgusting: if you see it from a distance, it’s always a mechanical and oh-really-gross act and I don’t really think that ‘love’ may change it. But they do! And they want you to believe them! And so they start saying a lot of silly and sappy things about how much they love their significant another and blah blah blah, they’ll wait their soulmate blah blah blah. Usually they turn out to be: 1) romantics girls/boy I’d like to kill with a chainsaw; 2) porn addicts. I don’t get them. At all.
…This was just a random post I wanted to write because I’m a complaining cat.
Mostly, though, Jim's pretty sure his image has nothing to do with that at all. In the end, it all comes down to how he holds himself - with confidence. It goes like this: sex is what everyone wants, even if they won't admit it. All sexually dissatisfied people are miserable inside and desperate to get laid. Therefore, successful, confident, happy people must be having exactly as much sex as they want.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
because notdolan requested more
(Anonymous) 2012-05-16 07:35 am (UTC)(link)I kind of prefer the first type. At least, they don’t deny that sexual attraction is something completely normal to them and also a part of their basic instincts: there’s no elegant excuse behind their acts and intentions. They’re generally really gross people and I find talking with them really annoying, but I can deal with them somehow. If they don’t send me pictures of genitalia. And they usually do (I AM DISAPPOINT).
But I can’t stand the second type. They’re quite hypocritical, aren’t they? They try to justify their basic instincts with this fake excuse of ‘doing an act of love’. Because if you love someone, you must want to have sex with them (and here’s a kick in asexual people’s faces!). This is really annoying. To me sex is disgusting: if you see it from a distance, it’s always a mechanical and oh-really-gross act and I don’t really think that ‘love’ may change it. But they do! And they want you to believe them! And so they start saying a lot of silly and sappy things about how much they love their significant another and blah blah blah, they’ll wait their soulmate blah blah blah. Usually they turn out to be: 1) romantics girls/boy I’d like to kill with a chainsaw; 2) porn addicts. I don’t get them. At all.
…This was just a random post I wanted to write because I’m a complaining cat.
END OF THE STORY.
Re: because notdolan requested more
(Anonymous) 2012-05-16 07:37 am (UTC)(link)Re: because notdolan requested more
(Anonymous) 2012-05-16 07:38 am (UTC)(link)Re: because notdolan requested more
lol wat
Re: because notdolan requested more
(Anonymous) 2012-05-16 07:48 am (UTC)(link)<3